[{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/plan-ochrany-autorskych-prav-v-europe-preco-bol-taky-kontroverzny\/#Article","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/plan-ochrany-autorskych-prav-v-europe-preco-bol-taky-kontroverzny\/","headline":"Pl\u00e1n ochrany autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v v Eur\u00f3pe: Pre\u010do bol tak\u00fd kontroverzn\u00fd?","name":"Pl\u00e1n ochrany autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v v Eur\u00f3pe: Pre\u010do bol tak\u00fd kontroverzn\u00fd?","description":"Ako sa v\u0161ak E\u00da sna\u017eila transformova\u0165 svoje autorsk\u00e9 pr\u00e1va pre digit\u00e1lny vek, presne to sa stalo – a poslanci EP odmietli smernicu o autorskom pr\u00e1ve . \u00a0 Ak\u00fd bol teda probl\u00e9m? V\u0161etko to dopadlo len na dve mal\u00e9 \u010dasti navrhovan\u00e9ho textu. \u00a0 \u010cl\u00e1nok 13, kritici tvrdili, \u017ee by bolo takmer nemo\u017en\u00e9 nahra\u0165 aj t\u00fa najmen\u0161iu […]","datePublished":"2019-07-19","dateModified":"2019-07-19","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/author\/#Person","name":"acron.sk\n","url":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/author\/","identifier":1,"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53fcaa7178df0f37d30678446939b206ab1017330cccbc8c93b5efa33cddcf51?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53fcaa7178df0f37d30678446939b206ab1017330cccbc8c93b5efa33cddcf51?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"acron.sk","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"\/logo.png","url":"\/logo.png","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/img_a304139_w2036_t1564580801.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/img_a304139_w2036_t1564580801.jpg","height":0,"width":0},"url":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/plan-ochrany-autorskych-prav-v-europe-preco-bol-taky-kontroverzny\/","about":["Online"],"wordCount":367,"articleBody":"Ako sa v\u0161ak E\u00da sna\u017eila transformova\u0165 svoje autorsk\u00e9 pr\u00e1va pre digit\u00e1lny vek, presne to sa stalo – a poslanci EP odmietli smernicu o autorskom pr\u00e1ve .\u00a0Ak\u00fd bol teda probl\u00e9m? V\u0161etko to dopadlo len na dve mal\u00e9 \u010dasti navrhovan\u00e9ho textu.\u00a0\u010cl\u00e1nok 13, kritici tvrdili, \u017ee by bolo takmer nemo\u017en\u00e9 nahra\u0165 aj t\u00fa najmen\u0161iu \u010das\u0165 diel chr\u00e1nen\u00fdch autorsk\u00fdmi pr\u00e1vami na Facebook, YouTube alebo in\u00e9 str\u00e1nky.\u00a0To by znamenalo, \u017ee u\u017e nie s\u00fa \u017eiadne filmy z filmov, \u017eiadne remixy skladieb a nebezpe\u010denstvo kon\u0161tantn\u00fdch blokov automatick\u00fdmi syst\u00e9mami.\u00a0\u010cl\u00e1nok 11, in\u00e1 kontroverzn\u00e1 \u010das\u0165, mohla sp\u00f4sobi\u0165, \u017ee prepojenie bolo \u0165a\u017e\u0161ie, preto\u017ee by dalo vydavate\u013eom spr\u00e1v lep\u0161iu kontrolu nad ich obsahom.\u00a0To v\u0161etko viedlo k viac ako 800 000 podpisom na pet\u00edciu proti n\u00e1vrhom v \u010dase, ke\u010f pri\u0161lo hlasovanie – a zd\u00e1 sa, \u017ee poslanci EP po\u010duli v\u00fdkrik.\u00a0Komis\u00e1r E\u00da za navrhovan\u00fd z\u00e1kon v\u0161ak kritizoval n\u00e1mietky kritikov a mal podporu nov\u00edn a mnoh\u00fdch \u0161pi\u010dkov\u00fdch hudobn\u00edkov.\u00a0Stru\u010dne povedan\u00e9, \u017ee ka\u017ed\u00e1 webov\u00e1 str\u00e1nka, ktor\u00e1 „d\u00e1va verejnosti pr\u00edstup k dielam chr\u00e1nen\u00fdm autorsk\u00fdmi pr\u00e1vami … nahran\u00fdmi jej u\u017e\u00edvate\u013emi“, musela z\u00edska\u0165 povolenie od toho, kto vlastn\u00ed autorsk\u00e9 pr\u00e1va – pravdepodobne prostredn\u00edctvom licen\u010dnej zmluvy.\u00a0Ak by toto povolenie nemalo, str\u00e1nka by ho musela zablokova\u0165.\u00a0Zd\u00e1 sa to jednoduch\u00e9 – \u017ee vlastn\u00edci autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v (vr\u00e1tane oby\u010dajn\u00fdch \u013eud\u00ed, ktor\u00ed napr\u00edklad fotia) by mali plati\u0165 za svoju pr\u00e1cu a ma\u0165 kontrolu nad t\u00fdm, kde sa objavuj\u00fa.\u00a0Mnoh\u00ed oponenti sa zhodli, \u017ee je to dobr\u00fd n\u00e1pad. N\u00e1vrhy v\u0161ak klad\u00fa d\u00f4raz na webov\u00e9 str\u00e1nky na kontrolu v\u0161etk\u00e9ho nahran\u00e9ho pou\u017e\u00edvate\u013emi. To je pre \u013eud\u00ed nemo\u017en\u00e9.\u00a0V slu\u017ebe YouTube sa napr\u00edklad ka\u017ed\u00fdch 400 min\u00fat nahr\u00e1 400 hod\u00edn videa – hlasitos\u0165, ktor\u00fa nem\u00f4\u017eu spravova\u0165 skuto\u010dn\u00ed \u013eudia.\u00a0Navrhovan\u00fd z\u00e1kon umo\u017e\u0148oval v\u00fdnimky pre mal\u00e9 podniky, ale v\u0161etci ostatn\u00ed by takmer ur\u010dite potrebovali pou\u017e\u00edva\u0165 automatick\u00fd syst\u00e9m.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        4.3\/5 - (7 votes)        "},{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Pl\u00e1n ochrany autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v v Eur\u00f3pe: Pre\u010do bol tak\u00fd kontroverzn\u00fd?","item":"https:\/\/www.acron.sk\/plan-ochrany-autorskych-prav-v-europe-preco-bol-taky-kontroverzny\/#breadcrumbitem"}]}]